Bruce Eckel <BruceEckel-Python3234 at mailblocks.com> writes:
> I'd like to restart this discussion; I didn't mean to put forth active
> objects as "the" solution, only that it seems to be one of the better,
> more OO solutions that I've seen so far.
>
> What I'd really like to figure out is the "pythonic" solution for
> concurrency. Guido and I got as far as agreeing that it wasn't
> threads.
>
> Here are my own criteria for what such a solution would look like:
Just because I've been mentioning it everywhere else since I read it,
have you seen this paper:
http://research.microsoft.com/Users/simonpj/papers/stm/
? I don't know how applicable it would be to Python but it's well
worth the time it takes to read.
Cheers,
mwh
--
This makes it possible to pass complex object hierarchies to
a C coder who thinks computer science has made no worthwhile
advancements since the invention of the pointer.
-- Gordon McMillan, 30 Jul 1998
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4