At 08:19 AM 9/22/2005 -0700, Rich Burridge wrote: >Hi, > >Recently I asked about the inclusion of a "vendor-packages" >directory for Python on the Python mailing list. > >See the thread started at: > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2005-September/300029.html > >for the full reasoning behind this request, and the replies >I received. I'm with Terry on this, it needs a better rationale. Why can't you just add a .pth file to the site-packages directory? It seems that would address the issue nicely. (See http://docs.python.org/lib/module-site.html for documentation of the .pth mechanism, which would let you implement a separate vendor-packages directory without modifying Python, and would still allow local overrides of your vendor packages.)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4