Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> writes: > On Thursday 22 September 2005 23:36, Jeremy Maxfield wrote: >> Can the fix for [ 1163563 ] Sub threads execute in restricted mode >> ( >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1163563&gr >>oup_id=5470&atid=105470 ) >> go in before 2.4.2 final? >> This is a real show stopper for us - we can't move to 2.4 without >> it. Cheers, >> Max > > I'm not sure - mwh, how risky a patch is this? Well, unless I'm much mistaken it's in 2.4.2c1.... Cheers, mwh -- I think if we have the choice, I'd rather we didn't explicitly put flaws in the reST syntax for the sole purpose of not insulting the almighty. -- /will on the doc-sig
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4