Greg Ewing wrote: > Ron Adam wrote: > > >>(a if e then b) >>((a1 if e1 then b1) if e then b) >>(a if e then (a2 if e2 then b2)) >>((a1 if e1 then b1) if e then (a2 if e2 then b2)) > > > I think you mean 'else' rather than 'then' in all > those, don't you? Yes of course, thanks for correcting.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4