RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 22 01:54:02 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056643.html

I agree with Skip.

Bill

> I suppose this is a dead horse now, but I will kick it one more time.
> 
> Under the rubrics of "explicit is better than implicit" and "there should
> only be one wat to do it", I would rather see
> 
>     bool_val = bool(foo or bar)
> 
> instead of having the "or" operator implicitly call bool() for me.  There's
> clear value to the current semantics and it's so easy to get a boolean if
> you want it, I see no reason for a change.
> 
> Skip

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056643.html below:

[Python-Dev] "and" and "or" operators in Py3.0