RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 21 03:39:07 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056603.html

BJörn Lindqvist wrote:

> Wouldn't it be possible to omit "and" and "or" to just "then" and "else"? 
> 
> x = 3 and 7 or 44
> x = 3 and then 7 or else 44
> x = 3 then 7 else 44
> 
> And then have another set of and and or for non short-circuiting? 

I don't think the OP was suggesting that 'and' and 'or' be
non-short-circuiting, only that they coerce their evaluated
operands to bool. Short-circuiting vs. non-short-circuiting
is an orthogonal issue.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056603.html below:

[Python-Dev] "and" and "or" operators in Py3.0