On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 17:40, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Ouch. You're bringing up another valid issue: whether to support > "elif". I think if we go with (if ... then ... else ...) or (if ...: > ... else: ...) we'll have to support elif as well: I'm not so sure. Once you start writing such a complicated thing, I think readability will favor just breaking the code out into traditional if-blocks. I'd be happy enough with just a binary condition. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20050920/492f314d/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4