[Guido van Rossum] > > In fact, I think Raymond's example is more properly considered an > > argument for adding a conditional expression than for removing the > > current behavior of the and/or shortcut operators; had we had a > > conditional expression, he wouldn't have tried to use the "x and y or > > z" syntax that bit him. [Terry Reedy] > I agree. Me too. > Given the later addition of generator expressions with mandatory > parentheses , the mandatory-parentheses version of a conditional > expression > looks less strange to me than it did then ;-). Same here. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4