RetroSearch Browse

Tue Sep 20 17:45:00 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056544.html

Would this change break x < y < z ?  Hope not.

+1 on x?y:z
-1  on && || replacing and/or
   unless and/or kept with current semantics and
   && || introduced Raymond's boolean idea, but then
-1 too many unrelated but different spellings 

On 9/19/05, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> On 9/19/05, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote:
> > I propose that in Py3.0, the "and" and "or" operators be simplified to
> > always return a Boolean value instead of returning the last evaluated
> > argument.
> 
> While you're at it, maybe we should switch to && and || as well?
> That's another thing I always mistype when switching between
> languages...
> 
> Also, this proposal needs to be considered together with the addition
> of a proper conditional operator, like x?y:z.
> 
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ldlandis%40gmail.com
> 

-- 
LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056544.html below:

[Python-Dev] "and" and "or" operators in Py3.0