RetroSearch Browse

Tue Sep 20 05:07:06 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056522.html

Terry Reedy wrote:
> I consider the current situation to be a consistency feature.  To a first 
> approximation, Python function calls 'pass' objects by name-binding:
> 
> param_name_list = arg_object_list
> 
> Disabling structure unpacking in this assignment would make the language 
> slightly more complex.

But it's a rather selective kind of consistency. To be
truly consistent in this sense, arbitrary lvalues would
have to be allowed in the parameter list.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056522.html below:

[Python-Dev] removing nested tuple function parameters