Gareth McCaughan <gmccaughan at synaptics-uk.com> wrote: > The problems with syntax are > > 1 It adds cognitive load. > 2 It makes your code look like line noise. > 3 It reduces options for future development. > 4 It complicates the parser. > > I don't know about #4, but I suspect it (along with the related > "it requires work, and there isn't much benefit from it") is the > best argument against this proposal. I don't think the parser would get measureably more complex, but I believe that any work to support this uncommon (from my experience) operation, rather than the dozens of other usable RFEs in the tracker, would be misspent time. - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4