A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056448.html below:

[Python-Dev] Compatibility between Python 2.3.x and Python 2.4.x

[Python-Dev] Compatibility between Python 2.3.x and Python 2.4.x [Python-Dev] Compatibility between Python 2.3.x and Python 2.4.x"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Sep 16 19:22:50 CEST 2005
Rich Burridge wrote:
>>And I forgot to give you this link: 
>>http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/whatsnew24.html
> 
> 
> That lists the changes. It's not clear (at least to me) whether
> these changes are incompatible.

The section

http://docs.python.org/whatsnew/node15.html

is meant to cover incompatible changes. It shows that there is
no 100% compatibility, but that only "borderline" code is affected.
Probably the most significant change is that 0xC0000000 is now
a positive number, when it used to be negative on 32-bit systems.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4