RetroSearch Browse

Thu Sep 15 03:29:41 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056416.html

> some time ago, I proposed a string method "dedent" (which currently is
in
> the
> textwrap module). The RFE is at http://python.org/sf/1237680.
> 
> Any opinions? If I don't get positive comments, I'll reject it.

-1

Let it continue to live in textwrap where the existing pure python code
adequately serves all string-like objects.  It's not worth losing the
duck typing by attaching new methods to str, unicode, UserString, and
everything else aspiring to be string-like.  

String methods should be limited to generic string manipulations.
String applications should be in other namespaces.  That is why we don't
have str.md5(), str.crc32(), str.ziplib(), etc.

Also, I don't want to encourage dedenting as a way of life --- programs
using it often are likely to be doing things the hard way.

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056416.html below:

[Python-Dev] str.dedent