RetroSearch Browse

Mon Sep 12 07:24:34 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056372.html

Nick Coghlan wrote:

> However, such a "future_builtins" module could still include modified versions 
> of those standard objects - such "future-proofed" code would simply still need 
> to deal with the fact that other libraries or clients may pass in the 
> old-style components (e.g. just as unicode-aware code needs to deal with the 
> fact that other libraries or clients may produce 8-bit strings rather than 
> unicode text).

And be careful not to pass them to old code which expects the
traditional versions of these objects.

Sounds far too tricky and error-prone to be worth the trouble
to me.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056372.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and iterators