RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 7 11:53:13 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056281.html

On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 02:01:01AM -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
[...]
> Just an FYI; Pyrex certainly makes it relatively painless to write code 
> that interfaces with C, but it doesn't do much for performance, and 
> naively-written Pyrex code can actually be slower than carefully-optimized 
> Python code.  So, for existing modules that were written in C for 
> performance reasons, Pyrex isn't currently a substitute.

I just want to second this; my experiments with pyrex on pysync
produced no speedups. I got a much more noticable speed benefit from
psyco. This was admittedly a long time ago...

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Donovan Baarda                http://minkirri.apana.org.au/~abo/
----------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056281.html below:

[Python-Dev] reference counting in Py3K