RetroSearch Browse

Tue Sep 6 17:35:43 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056242.html

Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes:

> On 9/3/05, Bill Janssen <janssen at parc.com> wrote:
>> So here's the summary of the arguments against: two style points
>> (trailing comma and >>stream) (from the man who approved the current
>> decorator syntax!), and it's hard to extend.  (By the way, I agree that
>> the ">>" syntax is ugly, and IMO a bad idea in general.  Shame the "@"
>> wasn't used instead. :-)
>> 
>> Seems pretty weak to me.  Are there other args against?
>
> Sure. I made the mistake of thinking that everybody knew them. 

[...]

> But more important to me are my own experiences exploring the
> boundaries of print.

[...]

Gnnnnnyagh, couldn't you have *started* the thread with that post? :)

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Get out your salt shakers folks, this one's going to take more
  than one grain.                 -- Ator in an Ars Technica news item

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056242.html below:

[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0