RetroSearch Browse

Sun Sep 4 12:19:46 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056146.html

Tony Meyer wrote:
> [Nick Coghlan]
> 
>>"Print as statement" => printing sequences nicely is a pain
> 
> 
> What's wrong with this?
> 
> 
>>>>print range(10)
> 
> [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
> 
>>>>print tuple("string")
> 
> ('s', 't', 'r', 'i', 'n', 'g')

> 
> This is a serious question - that's how I would expect a print function to
> work anyway.

Py> print (x*x for x in range(10))
<generator object at 0x00AE71C0>

Oh, wait, this is what I actually meant:

Py> print " ".join(map(str, (x*x for x in range(10))))
0 1 4 9 16 25 36 49 64 81

Printing the contents of an arbitrary iterable is harder than it should be.
Many iterables (including the builtin ones) have a reasonable default display,
but a non-default display (e.g. linefeed separated instead of comma separated)
isn't the most obvious thing to express.

I thought making print a function solved that problem, but it doesn't really.
So I'm currently exploring a different approach involving string formatting.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056146.html below:

[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0