A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056141.html below:

[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0

[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0 [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Sun Sep 4 07:54:57 CEST 2005
Bill Janssen wrote:
> I think what Nick really is asking for is a better print statement --
> and there's no particularly good reason to move to a function to
> attain that end.

Well one reason (you can judge for yourself whether it's "good" or
not) is that adding more syntax to the print statement will make
Python's parser more complex, while converting the print statement to
a function should make Python's parser simpler.

STeVe
-- 
You can wordify anything if you just verb it.
        --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4