Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056123.html below:

[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> To me, the main objection seems to revolve around the fact that people would 
> like to be able to "future-proof" Python 2.x code so that it will also run on 
> Py3k.

Nick,

You seem to be dreaming.  People like the "print" statement for many
and varied reasons, it seems.  Skip's point about gratuitous breakage
is one good argument for retaining it, but by no means the main
argument.

Bill

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4