On 9/2/05, skip at pobox.com <skip at pobox.com> wrote: > > Nope, but there is a large body of code out there that does use print > statements already. Again, I know you're prepared for breakage, but that > doesn't necessarily mean a completely blank sheet of paper. Ideally I very much prefer that print become a function. However, the major backlash has swayed me some, if for no other reason that people are so strongly against changing it. What if a tool existed that did the conversion? I realize that the tool is unlikely to be perfect, but what if it could do 99.9% of the job? I'm not thinking about just fixing print, but also converting iterkeys/itervalues/iteritems, xrange -> range, raw_input -> input, warning about use of input(), etc. I'm sure this tool wouldn't be perfect, but if it did most of the work, would that change opinions? n
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4