RetroSearch Browse

Fri Sep 2 12:40:35 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056035.html

On Thursday 2005-09-01 18:09, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> They *are* cached and there is no cost to using the functions instead
> of the methods unless you have so many regexps in your program that
> the cache is cleared (the limit is 100).

Sure there is; the cost of looking them up in the cache.

    >>> import re,timeit

    >>> timeit.re=re
    >>> timeit.Timer("""re.search(r"(\d*).*(\d*)", "abc123def456")""").timeit(1000000)
    7.6042091846466064

    >>> timeit.r = re.compile(r"(\d*).*(\d*)")
    >>> timeit.Timer("""r.search("abc123def456")""").timeit(1000000)
    2.6358869075775146

    >>> timeit.Timer().timeit(1000000)
    0.091850996017456055

So in this (highly artificial toy) application it's about 7.5/2.5 = 3 times
faster to use the methods instead of the functions.

-- 
g

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056035.html below:

[Python-Dev] Revising RE docs