A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/055931.html below:

Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())

[Python-Dev] stat() return value (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition()) [Python-Dev] stat() return value (was: Re: Proof of the pudding: str.partition())skip@pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Thu Sep 1 02:59:36 CEST 2005
    >> In the case of stat() there is no reason other than historic for the
    >> results to be returned in any particular order,

    Terry> Which is why I wonder whether the sequence part should be dropped
    Terry> in 3.0.

I think that would be a good idea.  Return an honest-to-goodness stat object
and also strip the "st_" prefixes removed from the attributes.  There's no
namespace collision problems from which the prefixes protect us.

Skip
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4