> > - yet others think: "I want all of Unicode, with proper, efficient > > indexing, so I want four bytes per char". > > I doubt the last one though. Probably they really don't want efficient > indexing, they want to perform higher-level operations that currently > are only possible using efficient indexing or slicing. With the right > API. perhaps they could work just as efficiently with an internal > representation of UTF-8. I just got mail this morning from a researcher who wants exactly what Martin described, and wondered why the default MacPython 2.4.2 didn't provide it by default. :-) Bill
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4