On Oct 16, 2005, at 9:56 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On and off, I've been looking for an elegant way to handle
> properties using
> decorators.
This isn't my idea, and it might have been brought up here in the
past to the same sorts of screams of horror to which you refer later,
but I use the 'apply' pattern without too many internal objections
for this:
class Foo(object):
# just a simple example, practically pointless
_my_property = None
@apply
def my_property():
def get(self):
return self._my_property
def set(self, value):
self._my_property = value
return property(get, set)
IMHO, I find this easier to parse than either of your two examples.
Apologies if this has already been screamed at. :-)
Gary
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4