On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 18:47:51 +0200, Bruce Eckel wrote (in article <415220344.20051007104751 at MailBlocks.com>): > It's hard to know how to answer. I've met enough brilliant people to > know that it's just possible that the person posting really does > easily grok concurrency issues and thus I must seem irreconcilably > thick. This may actually be one of those people for whom threading is > obvious (and Ian has always seemed like a smart guy, for example). I think it depends on which "level" you're talking about, concurrency IS very easy and "natural" at a conceptual level. It's also quite easy for doing basic stuff ... but it can become very complicated if you introduce different requirements and/or the system becomes complex and/or you're going to implement the actual mechanism. That's my limited experience (personally, I really like concurrency ... and to be honest, some people can't really understand the concept at all while others have no problem so it's a "personal thing" also)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4