Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-November/058420.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposed additional keyword argument in logging calls

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Short-circuiting iterators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I couldn't think of a good reason why it should be possible to overwrite these
> values with values from a user-supplied dictionary, other than to spoof log
> entries in some way. The intention is to stop a user accidentally overwriting
> one of the above attributes.

This makes sense, but is it worth the time to check on each logging call?

-jJ

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Short-circuiting iterators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4