Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-November/058398.html below:

[Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 11/29/05, Michael Chermside <mcherm at mcherm.com> wrote:
> Right now, we say that there's one rule for all *normal* attributes and
> methods, and a slightly different rule for all double-underbar methods.

But it's not normal vs. __xyzzy__. A specific set of slots (including
next, but excluding things like __doc__) get special treatment. The
rest don't. All I'm saying is that I don't care to give __context__
this special treatment.

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Metaclass problem in the "with" statement semantics in PEP 343
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4