On 11/17/05, Walter Dörwald <walter at livinglogic.de> wrote: > Am 17.11.2005 um 22:03 schrieb Guido van Rossum: > > > On 11/17/05, Walter Dörwald <walter at livinglogic.de> wrote: > >> Currently StringIO.StringIO and cStringIO.StringIO behave differently > >> when iterating a closed stream: > >> > >> s = StringIO.StringIO("foo") > >> s.close() > >> s.next() > >> > >> gives StopIteration, but > >> > >> s = cStringIO.StringIO("foo") > >> s.close() > >> s.next() > >> > >> gives "ValueError: I/O operation on closed file". > >> > >> Should they raise the same exception? Should this be fixed for 2.5? > > > > I think cStringIO is doing the right thing; "real" files behave the > > same way. > > > > Submit a patch for StringIO (also docs please) and assign it to me and > > I'll make sure it goes in. > > http://www.python.org/sf/1359365 Thanks! > Doc/lib/libstringio.tex only states "See the description of file > objects for operations", so I'm not sure how to update the > documentation. OK, so that's a no-op. I hope there isn't anyone here who believes this patch would be a bad idea? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4