Robert Kern <robert.kern at gmail.com> wrote: > > [1] There *is* an array type for general PyObjects in scipy_core, but > that's not being used in the code that blows up and has nothing to do > with the problem Travis is talking about. I seemed to have misunderstood the discussion. Was the original user accessing and saving copies of many millions of these doubles? That's the only way that I would be able to explain the huge overhead, and in that case, perhaps the user should have been storing them in scipy arrays (or even Python array.arrays). - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4