Brett Cannon wrote: > On 11/13/05, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: >> Thomas Lee wrote: >>> Implemented as you suggested and tested. I'll submit the patch to the >>> tracker on sourceforge shortly. Are you guys still after contextual >>> diffs as per the developer pages, or is an svn diff the preferred way to >>> submit patches now? >> svn diff should be fine. Although I thought Brett had actually updated those >> pages after the move to svn. . . >> > > I did. But the docs just need to be revamped. But I can't start on > that work until people tell me if they prefer FAQ-style (question > listing all steps and then a question covering each step) or > essay-style (bulleted list and then a definition/paragraph on each > step) for bug/patch guidelines. I'd prefer essay-style for the guidelines themselves, with appropriate pointers to the guidelines from the dev FAQ. However, I also think either approach will work, so I suggest going with whichever you find easier to write :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4