On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 16:38, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > I think part of the problem is that setup.py has a bunch of heuristics > that are intended to do the right thing without user intervention. > If, on the other hand, the user wants to intervene, because "the right > thing" is wrong for cross-compiling, you are kind of stuck. I don't > think there is an obvious way to select the extension modules to build > and the C libraries for them to link against. This relates to an issue we've had to workaround with the distutils based module builds in Python. For some of the modules, we want the auto-detection code to find versions of dependent libraries in locations other than the "standard" system locations. I don't think there's a good way to convince the various setup.py scripts to look elsewhere for things, short of modifying the code. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20051107/69363bd3/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4