Bryan Olson wrote:
> From what I can tell, We need to address fixing the
> PEP process before there is any point in working on PEP's,
I think this is a somewhat fair point (although perhaps a bit overstated) -
David and Barry can be busy IRL, which can certainly slow down the process of
PEP submission. PEP 328 hung in limbo for a while on that basis (I'm going to
have to look into if and how PEP 328 relates to Python eggs one of these days.
. .).
Would it be worth having a PEP category on the RFE tracker, rather than
submitting pre-PEP's directly to the PEP editors? The process still wouldn't
be perfect, but it would widen the pool of people that can bring a pre-PEP to
the attention of python-dev.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4