A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-November/057919.html below:

[Python-Dev] Why should the default hash(x) == id(x)?

[Python-Dev] Why should the default hash(x) == id(x)? [Python-Dev] Why should the default hash(x) == id(x)?Noam Raphael noamraph at gmail.com
Sun Nov 6 01:03:22 CET 2005
On 11/5/05, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
> More generally, I claim that the current behaviour is better than
> *any* alternative. To refute this claim, you would have to come
> up with an alternative first.
>
The alternative is to drop the __hash__ method of user-defined classes
(as Guido already decided to do), and to make the default __eq__
method compare the two objects' __dict__ and slot members.

See the thread about default equality operator - Josiah Carlson posted
there a metaclass implementing this equality operator.

Noam
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4