> That's fine. I wish that you read my answer, think about it a little,
> and just tell me in a yes or a no if you still consider it dead. I
> think that I have answered all your questions, and I hope that at
> least others would be convinced by them, and that at the end my
> suggestion would be accepted.
I still consider it dead.
"If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea."
Also, not all user-defined classes have a __dict__, and not all
user-defined classes can have arbitrary attributes added to them.
c>>> class foo(object):
... __slots__ = ['lst']
... def __init__(self):
... self.lst = []
...
>>> a = foo()
>>> a.bar = 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
AttributeError: 'foo' object has no attribute 'bar'
>>>
- Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4