Tim Lesher wrote:
> Here's the first draft of the python-dev summary for the first half of
> May. Please send any corrections or suggestions to the summarizers (CC'ed).
Nice work again, folks.
This summary has convinced me that the right thing to do with PEP 3XX is to fix
the formatting, submit it again and immediately withdraw it. I think that's
worth doing due to the PEP draft's role in the PEP 340 discussion, but it looks
like the worthwhile ideas it contains are going to make their way into other
PEP's (like 343 and the updated/new generator API PEP), so I don't see much
value in keeping PEP 3XX alive as a competitor to PEP 343.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4