RetroSearch Browse

Thu May 19 13:00:46 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053911.html

On Thu, 19 May 2005, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> With PEP 344, this could simply be:
>
>    try:
>        parser.parseFile(file)
>    exeption Exception, exception:
>        raise type(exception)("Error at line %s in file %s" % (x,y))

Only if we also made all exceptions new-style classes.

That's just a minor nit, though.  The more important question to me is:

Do you care about the difference between a secondary exception that was
raised intentionally (as in your example) and a secondary exception due
to a problem in exception handling?

(For me, the answer is yes.)

-- ?!ng

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053911.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding content to exception messages