> > So at this point it seems your proposal is just nailing down specifics > for > > the open parts of PEP 325. > > Or PEP 288? That has throw() (albeit with a different signature). I > could do without the attributes though (PEP 342 provides a much better > solution IMO). > > If either of those PEP authors feels like updating their PEP, they > have my blessings! I probably won't get to writing my own for a few > more days. Okay, I volunteer to recast PEP 288 to encompass your combined proposal. Will tackle it in the morning. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4