RetroSearch Browse

Wed May 18 19:27:19 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053894.html

> > Should this maybe just be added to PEP 342?  To me, PEP 342 has
always
> > seemed incomplete without ways to throw() and close(), but that
could
> > easily be just me.  In any case I'd expect the implementation of
> > 'next(arg)' to have some overlap with the implementation of
'throw()'.
> 
> Maybe, but on the other hand this idea can be done independently from
> PEP 342. After the "monster-PEP" 340, I'd rather break proposals up in
> small parts.

+1

I want this as a separate PEP.  It is a straight-forward solution to
long standing issues.  I would rather not have it contaminated with
distracting issues and co-routine dreams.

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053894.html below:

[Python-Dev] Combining the best of PEP 288 and PEP 325:generator exceptions and cleanup