RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 16 08:24:59 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053800.html

Brett C. wrote:

> Nick's was obviously directly against looping, but, with no offense to Nick,
> how many other people were against it looping?  It never felt like it was a
> screaming mass with pitchforks but more of a "I don't love it, but I can deal"
> crowd.

My problem with looping was that, with it, the semantics
of a block statement would be almost, but not quite,
exactly like those of a for-loop, which seems to be
flying in the face of TOOWTDI. And if it weren't for
the can't-finalise-generators-in-a-for-loop backward
compatibility problem, the difference would be even
smaller.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053800.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 343 - Abstract Block Redux