> - was, under the covers, a (optential) looping construct. This > + was, under the covers, a (potential) looping construct. This I'm glad I didn't fix this one. I thought he meant to use "optional". Raymond Hettinger
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4