A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053743.html below:

[Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?

[Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux? [Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?Guido van Rossum gvanrossum at gmail.com
Sat May 14 07:32:27 CEST 2005
[Bill Janssen]
> I agree.  "with [VAR =] BLOCK:" just reads better.  "with BLOCK [as
> VAR]:" is OK, too.

Maybe someone can set up a public poll (isn't that something you can
do on Yahoo? Or some volunteer can probably write it in Zope in 3
minutes) asking whether people prefer 'do' or 'with'. I'll go with the
outcome; this is pretty much the only contentious point in PEP 343 at
this point.

(That's http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0343.html in case you missed my
announcement; somehow Gmail classified it as spam for me even though I
sent it myself! :-)

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4