Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053740.html below:

[Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I prefer 'with'.  The 'do' keyword sounds "loopy" and doesn't make
> grammatical sense.

I agree.  "with [VAR =] BLOCK:" just reads better.  "with BLOCK [as
VAR]:" is OK, too.  Or even "within", as in

  within BLOCK binding VAR:
      SOMETHING

Probably too techy.

Bill

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Merging PEP 310 and PEP 340-redux?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4