Guido van Rossum wrote: > So then the all-important question I want to pose is: do we like the > idea of using a (degenerate, decorated) generator as a "template" for > the do-statement enough to accept the slightly increased complexity? I can't see how this has anything to do with whether a generator is used or not. Keeping them separate seems to be a useful thing in its own right. Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4