RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 10 05:11:01 CEST 2005 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053589.html

Jim Jewett wrote:

> In case it isn't clear, I think named loops would be a mistake.  I
> wanted them when I first started, but ... at the moment, I can't
> think of any usage that wasn't an ugly speed hack, which is at
> least more explicit with the "raise Found" idiom.

I'm inclined to agree. Anything more elaborate than
breaking from a single place in the immediately
enclosing loop tends to be getting into the realm
of spaghetti, in my experience. Giving people named
loops would be tantamount almost to giving them
a goto.

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053589.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 340: Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)