Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053555.html below:

Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 340: Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 340: Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Josiah Carlson wrote:
> The argument over whether blocks should loop, I believe has been had;
> they should.  The various use cases involve multi-part transactions and
> such.

Then it is not so much looping but more pushing forward the state of 
the state of the block's life-cycle?
This might by a good moment to consider life-cycle support a la PROCOL.

--eric

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 340: Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 340: Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4