Shane Hathaway wrote: > Fair enough. The original point is that the documentation is unclear > about what a Py_UNICODE[] contains. I deduced that it contains either > UCS2 or UCS4 and implemented accordingly. Not only did I guess wrong, > but others will probably guess wrong too. Something in the docs needs > to spell this out. Again, patches are welcome. I was opposed to Nick's proposed changes, since they explicitly said that you are not supposed to know what is in a Py_UNICODE. Integrating the essence of PEP 261 into the main documentation would be a worthwhile task. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4