On 5/8/05, Jp Calderone <exarkun at divmod.com> wrote: > If such a construct is to be introduced, the ideal spelling would seem to be: > > for [VAR in] EXPR: > BLOCK1 > finally: > BLOCK2 While I have not been following this discussion at all (I don't have the energy or time to follow the development of yet another proposal - I'll wait for the PEP) this does read more naturally to me than any of the other contortions I've seen passing by. Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4