On May 7, 2005, at 5:09 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Please upload your doc-patch to SF. All of my proposals for what to change the documention to have been shot down by Martin. If someone has better verbiage that they'd like to see, I'd be perfectly happy to patch the doc. My last suggestion was: "This type represents the storage type which is used by Python internally as the basis for holding Unicode ordinals. Extension module developers should make no assumptions about the size of this type on any given platform." -- Nick
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4