Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-May/053510.html below:

[Python-Dev] New Py_UNICODE doc

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] New Py_UNICODE doc
• Next message: [Python-Dev] New Py_UNICODE doc
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nicholas Bastin wrote:
> Yes, but the important question here is why would we want that?  Why
> doesn't Python just have *one* internal representation of a Unicode
> character?  Having more than one possible definition just creates
> problems, and provides no value.

It does provide value, there are good reasons for each setting. Which
of the two alternatives do you consider useless?

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] New Py_UNICODE doc
• Next message: [Python-Dev] New Py_UNICODE doc
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4