Nicholas Bastin wrote: > Well, this is a completely separate issue/problem. The internal > representation is UTF-16, and should be stated as such. If the > built-in methods actually don't work with surrogate pairs, then that > should be fixed. Yes to the former, no to the latter. PEP 261 specifies what should and shouldn't work. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4